Business Process Improvement Consulting

Most process work fails because it documents the process someone describes rather than the one people actually run.

Book a call

There are two versions of every process in a growing company: the one people describe in a meeting, and the one they run on a Tuesday when something has gone wrong. Process improvement that only captures the first produces documentation nobody uses.

How we work

  • Observe before mapping. We watch the work happen — sit with the people doing it, follow real records through the system. The gap between described and actual process is where the improvement usually is.
  • Map the current state honestly. Including the workarounds. A workaround is information: it marks a place where the official process does not fit reality.
  • Remove before optimising. The cheapest step is the one deleted. Most processes at this size have accumulated approvals that made sense once.
  • Then redesign, then document. Documentation last, so you are not documenting a process that is about to change.
  • Then instrument. Cycle time, error rate, exception frequency — whatever tells you it has drifted.

Where this pays

AreaTypical finding
Quote to cashQuote, contract and invoice disagree; manual reconciliation absorbs finance time
OnboardingEvery new customer handled differently; delivery cannot forecast capacity
Sales handoffNo defined handoff, so context is lost between sold and delivered
ApprovalsThresholds that made sense at $2M and now block routine work
ReportingNumbers assembled by hand each month because no system is authoritative

Where the problems concentrate in revenue systems specifically, this usually becomes a revenue operations engagement instead — the same work, applied to a narrower and higher-value surface.

Start where it costs most

A short diagnostic across your highest-friction processes, with a prioritised view of what to fix and what it is worth.

Book a call

Common questions

Do you use a specific methodology?
We borrow from lean where it helps, but most problems at this size do not need a framework. They need someone to watch the work happen and remove the steps that stopped making sense two years ago.
Will this produce documentation nobody reads?
It does if you document first. We fix the process before writing it down, so what gets documented is worth following.
How do you know the improvement held?
Every redesigned process ships with a measure — cycle time, error rate, exception frequency. A process with no measure degrades quietly.